<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Susana Monaco Catalog Early Spring 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thephotographylink.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/susana-monaco-catalog-early-spring-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thephotographylink.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/susana-monaco-catalog-early-spring-2008/</link>
	<description>10 Minutes a Day.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: michaelcreagh</title>
		<link>http://thephotographylink.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/susana-monaco-catalog-early-spring-2008/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelcreagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephotographylink.wordpress.com/?p=935#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I posted behind the scenes photos from this shoot at:
http://michaelcreagh.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted behind the scenes photos from this shoot at:<br />
<a href="http://michaelcreagh.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://michaelcreagh.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelcreagh</title>
		<link>http://thephotographylink.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/susana-monaco-catalog-early-spring-2008/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelcreagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephotographylink.wordpress.com/?p=935#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Charlotte is beautiful.  In actuality, it was not very much post production on her at all.  She has the coolest eyes from a profile view.  It was one of the reasons we cast her.

The most photoshop was required on the extending the background in one or two shots.  It was a pretty big set we built, but apparently not big enough.

See more of this type of work at my blog:
http://michaelcreagh.wordpress.com/

Thanks
Michael Creagh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlotte is beautiful.  In actuality, it was not very much post production on her at all.  She has the coolest eyes from a profile view.  It was one of the reasons we cast her.</p>
<p>The most photoshop was required on the extending the background in one or two shots.  It was a pretty big set we built, but apparently not big enough.</p>
<p>See more of this type of work at my blog:<br />
<a href="http://michaelcreagh.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://michaelcreagh.wordpress.com/</a></p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Michael Creagh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thephotographylink</title>
		<link>http://thephotographylink.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/susana-monaco-catalog-early-spring-2008/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>thephotographylink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephotographylink.wordpress.com/?p=935#comment-92</guid>
		<description>No mannequin needed.  They had a great model, Charlotte.  ...that and a little post work.

If you want to see more of Charlotte go to: http://www.dnamodels.com/ then click through to new faces where you will find Charlotte.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mannequin needed.  They had a great model, Charlotte.  &#8230;that and a little post work.</p>
<p>If you want to see more of Charlotte go to: <a href="http://www.dnamodels.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dnamodels.com/</a> then click through to new faces where you will find Charlotte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolscircle</title>
		<link>http://thephotographylink.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/susana-monaco-catalog-early-spring-2008/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>foolscircle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thephotographylink.wordpress.com/?p=935#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I love those poses... did they use a Mannequin for the shots, or did they just photoshop a model's eyes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love those poses&#8230; did they use a Mannequin for the shots, or did they just photoshop a model&#8217;s eyes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
